flowerpot metronomic

Friday, April 5, 2013

'Deadline in Disaster' Documentary Chronicles Impact of Joplin Tornado

SPRINGFIELD, Mo. -- As we approach the 2-year anniversary of the Joplin tornado, students in the Ozarks are getting a sneak peek at a new document about the disaster.

Drury?University hosted a screening of the movie "Deadline in Disaster" at Clara Thompson Hall. It tells the story about the Joplin Globe staff trying to put out a paper after the tornado killed dozens and destroyed wide swaths of the city.

More than 160 people were killed and 8,500 homes, schools, and businesses were destroyed.

Carol Stark, editor of the Joplin Globe, says she hopes the documentary will help future journalists understand how to cover big stories in a time of devastation.

"We feel like we helped set the tone. We informed our readers. We also gave them hope that things were going to get better, that help was on the way and that we were going to survive this."

The documentary, put together by filmmakers Beth Pike and Steve Hudnell, will air on PBS stations throughout the state on May 22, the anniversary of the tornado.

Dr. Jennifer Silva Brown, Drury assistant professor of behavioral science, also presented her research on the Joplin survivor project. In 2011 and 2012, Silva Brown and her undergraduate behavioral science students conducted research on coping and resilience with survivors of the Joplin tornado.

"The most interesting thing we found overall is that the Joplin community has a whole is really resilient," she said. "Of course, with any disaster we have individuals that struggle and are not rebounding as well, but as a whole the community bounced back really well and it's a testament to the community of Joplin."

Eighty-seven lower income residents were studied on how they coped and bounced back. Research from Joplin will be used to help the community but also to help future survivors of disasters.

"We will have another storm somewhere in the country or across the world and what we've learned from our survivors will teach us for many years to come it will actually help and predict the survivors of the next storm."

Source: http://ozarksfirst.com/fulltext?nxd_id=789242

best super bowl ads chrysler super bowl commercial madonna half time show fiat 500 abarth madonna halftime m i a mia super bowl

Karen Fratti: 'The Americans' Recap: Ecstatic Oblivion In 'Safe House'

Note: Do not read on if you have not yet seen Season 1, Episode 9 of "The Americans," titled "Safe House."

Is it just me or was "Safe House" a bit like "Modern Family" this week? If everyone just slowed down and spoke up, there would be no confusion -- everyone could get the information they needed without needlessly battling each other, and solve all their problems. But that would be boring.

The joke's on me for speculating about what was going to happen with Amador and Martha and Nina last episode. The writers just took care of it. That's all well and good in terms of moving the plot along for the season finale wind-up, but this episode just didn't make sense on so many levels.

For example:

Amador was a weird dude. I know he claimed he was just a guy looking for one night stands at the Crab Shack, but first, when did he and Stan become close enough buds to get in a framed picture together? What's the timeline here? Do I just not understand male friendships?

Secondly, it's not like Chris had been doing secret recon on the Jennings. He was really going to take Philip 'down to station,' or an undisclosed location, to beat him up for staying over at Martha's? I'm not going to buy that he recognized 'Clark' from the Beeman's party. He was too busy talking shop the whole time to meet Philip and hardly checked out Elizabeth. Even when he almost recognized her on his death bed, he didn't. He was kidnapped and murdered for no good reason.

Except that then, because of all of the misunderstandings, Stan went all-in with the rogue mission his FBI friends were planning to capture Arkady, and Beeman got to unleash his pent up male rage on his first in command, Vlad. The worst punishment for a KGB agent during the Cold War is maybe dying by a bullet to the head while you're chewing bad American fast food.

Now the FBI is riled up over losing one more of their own in a botched mission that wasn't even a mission. And the KGB will probably be riled up by Beeman's cryptic phone call to Arkady just before offing Vlad. I'm no diplomat or historian, but doesn't that seem to sum up the Cold War? Veiled threats and called bluffs and a lot of fuss over nothing more than nationalist ideals and ego. So now we have to assume that the Jennings might be in trouble for messing up yet again. I thought the fun of this show was that they were going to start to be figured out by the FBI, but that hope is squashed.

Another thing that doesn't make sense is Martha's love for Clark. She's just so pathetic. Her and Chris would have made a good team. No, Martha, your relationship is not real, no matter how many breakfasts in bed you make for the man. Especially if you serve grapefruit.

And of course, the separation. If anyone can handle divorce, it's Elizabeth. But we all know it's not going to go that far. If there's one thing we can expect from this show, it's a quick, almost unexplainable solution to every issue that wasn't an issue the episode before. I'm guessing Philip will be back in the house for happily ever after by the time Elizabeth finishes the stir fry.

One last item of note: if anyone knows where I can my hands on the three owl lamp from the Jennings' foyer, please advise.

"The Americans" airs Wednesdays at 10 p.m. ET on FX.

Keri Russell as Elizabeth Jennings, Matthew Rhys as Phillip Jennings
Stills from "The Americans"
Keri Russell as Elizabeth Jennings
Stills from "The Americans"
Matthew Rhys as Phillip Jennings
Stills from "The Americans"

Follow Karen Fratti on Twitter: www.twitter.com/karenfratti

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karen-fratti/the-americans-recap-safe-house_b_3011385.html

san francisco 49ers stan musial Mega 49ers lance armstrong Earl Weaver Inauguration Schedule

Google Says Facebook Home Demonstrates Android's Openness, Framing Apple As Restrictive

Google’s statement on Facebook’s introduction of “Home” was short and sweet, but very telling, so let’s dissect it a little bit. As we noted earlier, Facebook went with Android first because of its flexibility. Basically it’s easy to customize. Other platforms, not so much. Zuckerberg even mentioned that Windows Phone might be a bit easier to work with, calling it out as “somewhere in the middle” of Android and iOS. Here’s what Google said to us a little while ago: The Android platform has spurred the development of hundreds of different types of devices. This latest device demonstrates the openness and flexibility that has made Android so popular. You’ll notice that the first thing that the company says is that there are “hundreds” of different types of devices running its mobile operating system. In the past, that’s been seen as a bad thing, due to fragmentation. Here, Google is clearly positioning this as an advantage, that is has more choices for consumers than say, Apple has. Secondly, “this latest device,” being the HTC First, which is pre-installed with Facebook Home, demonstrates flexibility. There’s that word again. Clearly, Google is firing a rocket at its competitor Apple, which is notoriously very stiff when it comes to customization. In Apple’s mind, its users don’t know what they want to see until it shows it to them. By letting a company like Facebook take over the first experience users have when they wake up their phone, they are giving away pretty much everything. Again, Google points this out as a competitive advantage. In an extended version of the statement to VentureBeat, Google made sure to pump up its own products at the same time: And it?s a win for users who want a customized Facebook experience from Google Play ? the heart of the Android ecosystem ? along with their favorite Google services like Gmail, Search, and Google Maps. In this added bit, Google makes sure to bring the attention back to its baked-in Android services, like search, email and maps. Is that Google getting a little bit jealous of all of the fuss over Facebook? Not at all. These companies are competitive in the sense that they’re both after eyeballs, but when it comes to social interactions, they couldn’t be more different. Forget the Google+ argument here; it wasn’t built to be a competitor to Facebook. Google owns search and email for

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/yNcSrDQvL3M/

NCAA Bracket 2013 Robert Morris spring lululemon jon hamm southern university biggest loser

Thursday, April 4, 2013

$700 million in Katrina relief vanished

Power Players

Where did all the money go?

?Your guess is as good as mine,? David Montoya, the inspector general of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, says of $700 million in missing taxpayer money that Louisiana homeowners were given in the wake of Hurricane Katrina to elevate and protect their homes from future storms.

A new report released from the inspector general?s office shows that more than 24,000 homeowners who received grants of up to $30,000 to elevate their homes either misspent or pocketed the money.

?The fact of the matter is that the money they received was for a specific purpose and the specific purpose was to elevate these homes to avoid future catastrophes,? Montoya tells Power Players.

He rates the home elevation program as little more than a complete failure.

?Considering there was just under $1 billion earmarked for this particular program and there's $700 million that wasn't used for that, I?d give it a very low D,? he says.

But the lessons learned from the failed home elevation project provides a useful roadmap as Congress moves to offer recovery funds to victims of Hurricane Sandy.

?Clearly, to give money out on the front end right after a disaster, when many of these people lost everything, with a promise to do something down the road, I think is counterproductive to what the program was designed to do,? says Montoya.

Montoya says his office will recommend that, for future disaster relief programs, funds are disbursed to individuals only after the project has been completed.

To hear more of the interview with the inspector general, including his explanation of why the government likely will never get the money back, check out this episode of Power Players.

ABC's Avery Miller, Robin Gradison, Eric Wray, Alexandra Dukakis, Hank Disselkamp, and John Knott contributed to this episode.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/where-did-money-700-million-katrina-relief-money-112137424.html

brandon jacobs brandon jacobs brian dawkins emma roberts north korea news north korea news giuliana and bill

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

N. Korea bars S. Koreans from joint factory

PAJU, South Korea (AP) ? North Korea on Wednesday barred South Korean workers from entering a jointly run factory park just over the heavily armed border in the North in the latest sign that Pyongyang's warlike stance toward South Korea and the United States is moving from words to action.

The Kaesong move came a day after the North announced it would restart its long-shuttered plutonium reactor and a uranium enrichment plant, both of which could produce fuel for nuclear weapons that Pyongyang is developing and has threatened to hurl at the U.S. but which experts don't think it will be able to accomplish for years.

The North's rising rhetoric over recent weeks has been met by a display of U.S. military strength, including flights of nuclear-capable bombers and stealth jets at the annual South Korean-U.S. military drills that the allies call routine but that North Korea claims are invasion preparations.

The Kaesong industrial park started producing goods in 2004 and has been an unusual point of cooperation in an otherwise hostile relationship between the Koreas, whose three-year war ended in 1953 with an armistice. Its continued operation even through past episodes of high tension has reassured foreign multinationals that another Korean War is unlikely and their investments in prosperous dynamic South Korea are safe.

"The Kaesong factory park has been the last stronghold of detente between the Koreas," said Hong Soon-jik, a North Korea researcher at the Seoul-based Hyundai Research Institute.

He said tension between the Koreas could escalate further over Kaesong because Seoul may react with its own punitive response and Pyongyang will then hit back with another move.

It is unclear how long North Korea will prevent South Koreans from entering the industrial park, which is located in the North Korean border city of Kaesong and provides jobs for more than 50,000 North Koreans. The last major disruption at the park amid tensions over U.S.-South Korean military drills in 2009 lasted just three days.

Seoul's Unification Ministry spokesman Kim Hyung-suk said Pyongyang was allowing South Koreans to return home from Kaesong. Some 33 workers of about 860 South Koreans at Kaesong returned Wednesday. But Kim said about 480 South Koreans who had planned to travel to the park Wednesday were being refused entry.

Trucks streamed back into South Korea through its Paju border checkpoint in the morning, just minutes after heading through it, after being refused entry into the North.

Pyongyang threatened last week to shut down the park, which is run with North Korean labor and South Korean know-how. It expressed anger over South Korean media reports that said North Korea hadn't yet shut the park because it is a source of crucial hard currency for the impoverished country.

About 120 South Korean companies operate factories in Kaesong which produced $470 million of goods such as clocks, clothing and shoes last year that are trucked back to the South for export to other countries. The industrial park is crucial for the small businesses that operate there to take advantage of North Korea's low wages but not important for the South Korean economy overall.

It has more significance to cash-strapped North Korea since, according to the South Korean government, wages for North Korean workers totaled some $81 million last year. That has underlined the risks that North Korea's brinkmanship will result in a miscalculation that results in an even more dangerous polarization of the Korean peninsula.

Barring entry to South Koreas is a "slap in the face" after the South Korean government recently extended medical aid to the North, said Lee Choon-kun, a North Korea researcher at the Korea Economic Research Institute, a Seoul-based think tank. "I see this as a start for more provocative actions," he said.

"The North has made too many threats not to stop short of any real action."

Kaesong, initially conceived as a test case for reunification and reconciliation, also provides an irksome reminder for Pyongyang that what it lacks, the South has in abundance ? material prosperity. An enormous gap emerged between the two Koreas in the decades after the Korean War as the South embraced a form of state-directed capitalism while the North adhered to communist central planning.

Every morning, North Korean workers commute to the complex on the edge of Kaesong on South Korean-made Hyundai buses. Once inside the gates of the complex, it's a world apart. The paved streets and sidewalks are marked with South Korean traffic signals and signs and the parking lots are filled with the Hyundai, Samsung and KIA cars driven by South Korean managers.

Inside several factories visited by The Associated Press last year, the posters on the walls are not party slogans but safety warnings. "Beware of fires," read one; "Wash your hands" read another. While most factories in North Korea are drafty, and few have running water, the facilities in Kaesong are equipped with hot water, flush toilets and air conditioners.

In the rest of the Korean Peninsula, it is illegal for Koreans from North and South to interact without government permission. But inside Kaesong, North Korean workers work side by side with South Korean managers, discussing orders and mapping out production.

However, they tend not to socialize with one another. At most factories, North Korean workers take their meals in cafeterias that serve basic stews and rice while the South Koreans dine separately.

Park Yun-kyu, who heads a men's apparel maker that employs 700 North Korean workers in Kaesong, said he was worried he couldn't send fresh food to his eight South Korean workers in Kaesong.

"They were working normally when I called them in the morning," said Park who returned to Seoul after being refused entry into Kaesong. "The problem is food. I hope North Korea would at least let us send food. We have to send food and some materials for production every day."

On Tuesday, a senior South Korean government official said Seoul has a contingency plan for its citizens in Kaesong. But he said the government hoped the tension would not lead to a shutdown of the complex. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he was not authorized to speak publicly to the media.

___

Associated Press writers Foster Klug, Hyung-jin Kim, Jean H. Lee, Sam Kim and Youkyung Lee in Seoul contributed to this report.

___

Follow Klug at twitter.com/APKlug, Sam Kim at twitter.com/samkim_ap, Youkyung Lee at twitter.com/YKLeeAP and Jean Lee at twitter.com/newsjean.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/nkorea-refuses-let-skoreans-enter-joint-factory-042751499--finance.html

dropkick murphys guernsey colcannon dystonia tourettes rosie o donnell soda bread recipe

Refiner shares fall on proposed EPA rules

The shares of a number of refinery companies sank Tuesday on the costs they could pay to comply with proposed changes to gasoline standards.

The Obama administration wants to reduce the amount of sulfur in gasoline and tighten auto emission standards to reduce pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency said Friday that the proposal would raise gasoline prices by less than a penny a gallon and add about $130 to the price of new vehicles, beginning in 2025.

Valero Energy Corp. spokesman Bill Day said Tuesday that the company expects to spend $300 million to $400 million building new equipment and expanding existing facilities to meet the new standards. Valero also expects spend more each year on operations to support these new processes, but exact costs have yet to be determined.

Day said that Valero does not plan to bear the costs alone and will pass them along to drivers at the pump.

Day's comments were first reported in the Wall Street Journal.

The EPA predicts $7 in health benefits for every dollar spent to implement the new rules.

The proposal has been praised by environmentalists and health advocates, as well as automakers, who say it will help the U.S. catch up with the cleaner fuels used in other nations. Opponents say gasoline prices are stubbornly high already and Americans shouldn't have to pay more. The oil industry, Republicans and some Democrats had urged the EPA to hold off on proposing the tighter regulations.

The EPA must hold public hearings before finalizing the rules, which it plans to take effect in 2017.

In afternoon trading Valero fell $2.56, or 5.7 percent, to $42.41. CVR Energy fell $2.70, or 5.2 percent, to $49.18. Marathon Petroleum Corp. dropped $4.40, or 4.9 percent, to $85.43. Tesoro Corp. fell $1.82, or 3.2 percent, to $55.03. Western Refining Inc. lost $2.49, or 7.1 percent, to $32.50.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/refiner-shares-fall-proposed-epa-200532566.html

tomb of the unknown soldier HMS Bounty dominion power Heather Clem Con Edison LaGuardia Airport weather radar